Discussion about this post

User's avatar
paul brown's avatar

i entirely agree that a significant portion of the SGs housing policy looks good but is doomed to failure.

However state funded housing in my view remains the answer.

Given that local authorities if allowed to borrow can do so much more economically than the private sector,and given the very large amounts spent on Housing Benefit , in the long term public housing must surely be a viable solution.

Put it another way: there doesn’t appear to be any other.

Of course short term subsidies will be necessary: increased tax on capital as well as reducing tax exemptions ( such as iSA s )seem perfectly viable and don’t require going anywhere near the more sensitive are of increasing income tax

Expand full comment
Jo Greenhorn's avatar

"A quarter of a million people are on the social housing waiting list in Scotland and it’s only really available for benefit claimants."

That is absolute nonsense. In my own area new housing has been built by SLC and most of those houses have gone to working families.

"It sometimes looks as if the only building allowed in Scottish cities is for students."

Well, yes, because the main Parties, Labour and Conservative, used further education as a means to cover up the lack of jobs available for young people and, suddenly, everyone wanted into Uni with accompanying Student Loans to fund fees (in rUK) and all the other debts that go with that. And even in Scotland, unis are making plenty out of non-Scottish students in the way of fees. It's big business and a cash cow. (Incidentally, there are many new premises for "students" currently being built in Glasgow, most headed by private (and foreign) companies all looking to make a killing.) Worse, suddenly everyone was "entitled" to go to uni and those bodies responded by messing with entry standards in order to meet that requirement, resulting in people leaving with "degrees" hardly worth the paper they were written on! (My sympathies, incidentally, are with potential employers who see "qualifications" presented by some who can barely write a single sentence.)

"Labour and the SNP blame Margaret Thatcher’s policy of council house sales. But that was 40 years ago and it is time this tired excuse was laid to rest."

That excuse remains valid because the knock on effect is still being felt. ALL receipts for sales of council housing went straight to the UK treasury, not to local councils. Councils, however, were left with the debts associated with those (now sold) properties, including mortgages/remortgages raised on them. Thatcher took the proceeds and left councils with the debts and the inability to build more houses to replace those sold. So, I repeat, Iain, highlighting Thatcher's role in all of this remains a valid point.

"House building has also been blocked by Nimbyism and restrictive planning laws."

Restrictive planning laws like not building on flood plains? The very description of such land makes the risks clear yet Gove is currently considering ripping up those planning laws. It is a disastrous policy. (Perhaps, when they build on land like that they'll throw in a free boat with the house, for a price of course!)

"Long term letting used to be a viable alternative to inflated house prices."

Not for me. Secure tenancies were never guaranteed.

"The result is that many buy to let property owners are voting with their feet and selling up."

The BTL industry was created by successive Tory and Labour governments and they were, and remain, for profit and nothing else. No empathy was involved for any landlord wanting to provide housing. If they are selling up now it's because they made plenty out of it when the going was good and are now squealing as interest rate rises are hitting their pockets, thus, those living in their properties and paying wild rents will be cut loose and turfed out.

"Yet landlords are not all bad and the truth is that Labour Chancellors like Gordon Brown supported the building of a private rented sector 20 years ago."

ALL landlords were in it for profit and little else. Some are just more responsible than others in maintaining their properties. Other than that, it's all about profit. And I know what Blair/Brown did to encourage the BTL industry. They even allowed the banks to introduce special loans for them. Shame on the pair of them because they're as much to blame for the mess we are in now re housing as the Tories.

"when taxes are already at a seventy year high."

This is just nonsense. When I started work in 1975 the basic rate was 35%. It is now 20%. The higher rates ranged from 40% right up to 65%. Capital Gains Tax regulations ensured the treasury took its share from those inheriting properties. Those regs have now been tinkered with in order to reduce the financial "pain" suffered by beneficiaries and make life a lot easier for them, the poor souls.

"Political parties like the SNP, Labour and the Greens...."

Not a mention of all the Tories have done on housing, Iain? No criticism at all? Not a thing? Just a ringing endorsement of "capitalism"?

Jesus wept! What is wrong with you?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts